UC2 · Step 3 of 5 — Choose a fix

Kavi Patel · Timekeeper · Tuesday, 14:10

The Resolution group offers Kavi three options. Each one represents a different judgment about what really happened.

Timekeeper workspace

The three resolutions, in plain English

Option When you pick it What the system does
Trim activity stop to 14:30 (punch out) The most common case — the activity was simply keyed a bit long. T. Brown punched out at 14:30, so the activity should end there too. Adjusts the activity end time. Recalculates units. Records an audit event. Clears the error.
Split activity at 14:30 · flag remainder for supervisor The over-punch represents real work that should have been on the clock. The supervisor needs to see it, decide if a punch adjustment is warranted, and possibly route to Kronos. Splits the activity into two segments. The "post-punch" remainder gets flagged for supervisor review.
Send to Kronos missing-punch queue · keep activity The employee almost certainly worked the full window — Kronos punch is wrong, not the activity. The activity stays. A missing-punch case is opened on the Kronos side. Phase one does not rewrite Kronos; it hands off through the existing queue.

What Kavi knows that the system doesn't

The choice between these three is judgment, not arithmetic. Kavi knows:

The app frames the choice cleanly, but the choice is his. In this case the line ran on time and T. Brown's pattern is "keys a few minutes long" — so Kavi picks Trim activity stop to 14:30.

What the app does not do

Why it matters

This is the moment that justifies why timekeeping exists as a role. The app's job is to surface the facts and offer the right shape of choice. The decision is Kavi's, and the audit trail makes it accountable.


⬅ Prev: Step 2 — Read the timeline · Use Case Index · 🏠 Demo Home · ▶ Next: Step 4 — Apply and watch downstream